Talk:Access Copyright

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

A confusingly-named article, although it did get my attention; but I thought it was about the database. I think it would be better to spell it out in the title and just use c-in-circle within the article. Stan 17:46 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

That is their name and is often used (exactly to get people's attention) however if some of you grey eminences around here think that it creates sorting problems then go ahead and change it. I don't think it will bother them (but I think they use lowercase as in access copyright not Access Copyright when it is written out. Alex756 19:29 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

Heh, after three months I'm hardly a grey eminence! :-) Stan 20:52 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

With the turnover I've seen on a lot of contributors anyone who gets past that first hump is and ol'timer. After all if the birth of Wikipedia was in 2001 then 3 months is about 1/9 the life of the project, this converts into about nine years of lifespan time (over 80 years) I think I would go grey after 3 months (actually I'm grey already). Besides, I'm probably (this is not legal advice) making reference to your PhD in Lisp implentation and working at Apple at least from the early 90s (as far back as I can search on DejaNews) you are a grey eminence that has deemed Wikipedia of merit! Alex756

I decided to move this page to 'Access copyright' to make linking easier (not everyone is familiar with the copyright entity). -- Notheruser 21:41 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

Official corporate name is "The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency" (please note the "The" ) . Also, this was listed as a non-profit (which in Canada implies charity). This corporation is a not-for-profit (something totally different under Canadian corporate law). 209.29.209.157 (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]